Export limit exceeded: 24483 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24483 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-9398 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 8 Firefox, Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| By checking the result of calls to `window.open` with specifically set protocol handlers, an attacker could determine if the application which implements that protocol handler is installed. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 131, Firefox ESR < 128.3, Thunderbird < 128.3, and Thunderbird < 131. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18839 | 2 Popt-devel, Redhat | 6 Popt-static, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 3 more | 2026-10-08 | 2.2 Low |
| An integer underflow was found in the popt library when formatting help text for option tables that exceed the terminal width. A local user who can cause an application to print help under those conditions may cause that application to crash or fail to display help, resulting in a denial of service of the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107444 | 1 Redhat | 2 Hummingbird, Satellite | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Katello where the Docker Tags repositories API does not properly enforce organization scoping when listing repositories for a Docker meta tag. An authenticated user with permission to view products in one organization may be able to retrieve repository metadata associated with Docker tags belonging to another organization by supplying the tag identifier. This can result in unauthorized disclosure of repository configuration information across organization boundaries. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18156 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security controls by forging user identities due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18154 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a hard-coded or predictable cryptographic key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18153 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authentication tags due to the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys and initialization vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18152 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75887 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit a path traversal vulnerability by manipulating the `lng` and `ns` query parameters in the `/locales/resource.json` endpoint. This allows the attacker to read sensitive `*.json` files from the pod filesystem, including plugin manifests and configuration files. Furthermore, this flaw can enable path traversal against registered dynamic-plugin backends. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75885 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-08 | 9.3 Critical |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-107623 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the OIDC Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) component of Keycloak. A bug in the response serialization causes the backchannel logout offline token revocation setting to be omitted from responses. When a client performs a standard update, this missing information causes the setting to be silently disabled. As a result, offline tokens may remain valid even after a user session is terminated via backchannel logout. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107604 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-10-08 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the installation provider and client registration endpoints of the Keycloak identity management service. A realm administrator with only the read-only view-clients role can access the active primary secret of any confidential client, which should normally be restricted. This exposed secret can be used to impersonate the client and gain unauthorized access to its associated service account permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107565 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 5.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in luksmeta. A local attacker with administrative privileges can cause data corruption when saving metadata to a Linux Unified Key Setup (LUKS) device. Due to incorrect boundary calculations and flawed overlap detection, new metadata entries can be written beyond available free space or over existing records. This issue can corrupt stored encrypted payload data or existing metadata, potentially rendering the affected data inaccessible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93017 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 7.7 High |
| The `insights-operator-gather` ClusterRole grants the operator's service account read access to secrets in the core API group with no namespace or resourceNames restriction — therefore, access to every secret in every namespace in the cluster. Ref: https://github.com/openshift/insights-operator/blob/8f15e3157ff09f54ab22801f5b21da35a195cc6d/manifests/03-clusterrole.yaml#L368-L373 ``` - apiGroups: - "" resources: - secrets verbs: - get - list ``` By spawning a pod with the gather service account mounted, an attacker will be able to access any secret in any namespace. ``` spec: serviceAccountName:"gather" ``` | ||||
| CVE-2026-11788 | 1 Redhat | 12 389 Directory Server, Directory Server, Directory Server E4s and 9 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The dereference control plugin does not check for allocation failure before using a BER structure, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server when the system is under memory pressure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11770 | 2 Port389, Redhat | 13 389-ds-base, 389 Directory Server, Directory Server and 10 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject LDAP search filters into the CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operation. Because the handler performs the search against cn=config with elevated replication plugin privileges and returns a boolean match result, the attacker can extract sensitive server configuration metadata, including replication bind DNs and password storage scheme information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76560 | 1 Redhat | 10 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The SELFDN ACI bind-rule evaluator incorrectly matches an anonymous LDAP client's empty bind DN against an empty stored attribute value, allowing an unauthenticated client to satisfy access control checks intended to require a matching authenticated identity. This can allow an anonymous LDAP client to perform an operation, such as adding or modifying a directory entry, that a SELFDN-based ACI intended to restrict to a specific authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18922 | 1 Redhat | 11 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. During SASL PLAIN authentication, a stale identity carried in a Cyrus SASL auxiliary property from a prior failed bind attempt can be installed on a connection following a subsequent, unrelated successful bind, regardless of which SASL mechanism completes that second bind. An attacker can send a SASL PLAIN bind as cn=Directory Manager with an incorrect password, then complete a SASL ANONYMOUS bind on the same connection, causing the server to grant Directory Manager authority without any valid credentials. A variant using a valid low-privileged account's own successful bind instead of an anonymous one is also possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19843 | 1 Redhat | 6 Directory Server, Directory Server E2s, Directory Server E4s and 3 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.4 High |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The Cockpit 389 Console's LDAP editor constructs an ldapsearch command by embedding an LDAP entry's distinguished name (DN) into a shell command string without proper escaping. An LDAP user with delegated privileges to create or rename directory entries could craft a malicious DN containing shell metacharacters. When a Cockpit administrator subsequently views the entry in the 389 Console, the embedded shell command executes with root privileges on the directory server host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18453 | 1 Redhat | 11 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A missing NULL pointer check in the paged results handling of op_shared_search allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted sequence of search requests using the USE_ONE_BACKEND control, resulting in denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18355 | 1 Redhat | 10 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF > 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow. | ||||