Export limit exceeded: 410007 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 410007 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 105481 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (105481 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16516 | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssl | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssh | 2026-10-13 | 7.4 High |
| wolfSSH does not validate that the ECDSA curve identifier in a KEXDH_REPLY host key blob matches the algorithm negotiated during key exchange. In ParseECCPubKey() (src/internal.c), the blob's algorithm string is used to derive the curve via NameToId/wcPrimeForId without checking against the negotiated ssh->handshake->pubKeyId, and the RFC 5656 curve identifier string is discarded via GetSkip() rather than compared. An active network man-in-the-middle attacker can substitute a host key blob containing a different ECDSA curve, causing the client to import the key on the wrong curve. Because the attacker controls the private key for the substituted curve, signature verification passes. Exploitation requires an active MitM position and a lax public key check callback (e.g., TOFU, algorithm-name-only check, or fingerprint match against the parsed key). | ||||
| CVE-2020-9287 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient Emergency Management Server, Forticlientems | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| A untrusted search path vulnerability in Fortinet may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via network exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2020-9290 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Forticlient, Forticlient Virtual Private Network, Forticlientwindows | 2026-10-13 | 7.1 High |
| A untrusted search path vulnerability in Fortinet may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via network exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2019-5589 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlientwindows | 2026-10-13 | 8.6 High |
| A untrusted search path vulnerability in Fortinet may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via network exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2026-83540 | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssl | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssh | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| When password or public key authentication is used with the Windows port of wolfSSHd, the Windows logon token acquired for one authenticated connection is not released before a token is acquired for a subsequent connection, resulting in user login poisoning between connections. A less privileged user with a valid account on the server can exploit this to force a login as a more privileged user. The vulnerability was introduced with the initial Windows port of wolfSSHd in wolfSSH version 1.4.15 and affects all versions through 1.5.0. Non-Windows builds of wolfSSHd are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87682 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| Multiple OS Command Injection vulnerabilities exist in the management interface and session processing routines of Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1. Input processing flaws during remote management connection validation and session verification for directory-based user accounts allow untrusted input containing shell metacharacters to reach internal system execution wrappers. An authenticated user or a compromised directory service account can exploit these vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary operating system commands with elevated privileges on the target device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87683 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the REST API management component of Brocade Fabric OS versions prior to 10.0.1. When processing API request payloads (such as device configuration attributes or port mapping requests) the REST API service fails to properly validate incoming array counts and string lengths against internal buffer capacities. An authenticated attacker with REST API access can transmit crafted, oversized request parameters to induce memory corruption on the execution stack. This may result in a denial-of-service condition (daemon crash) or potential arbitrary code execution within the management process context. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104626 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A user who can open a fork pull request can place workflow content with a shared run-level concurrency group into a Gitea Actions run that is awaiting approval. When a later run in that group cancels the blocked job, the run becomes terminal while still marked as needing approval. If a maintainer later approves the run, Gitea passed the already-cancelled job back through concurrency preparation, set it to waiting, and made it claimable by a matching runner, executing fork-controlled workflow code. Exploitation requires the maintainer's later approval action, Actions to be enabled, and a runner that accepts the repository's jobs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87665 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) protocol handler on Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1. The vulnerability occurs when processing initial IKE key exchange requests on extension switches or blades running IPsec-enabled Fibre Channel over IP (FCIP) circuits. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a single, specifically crafted UDP packet (Port 500) containing an oversized Nonce payload. Successful exploitation results in a denial of service (data-plane process crash) | ||||
| CVE-2026-104632 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| Gitea Actions blocks the jobs of workflow runs from first-time fork pull request contributors until a maintainer approves the run. The rerun path only required a run to be finished and built the new attempt's jobs without considering the pending approval, so when a user with Actions write access cancelled a run that was awaiting approval and then re-ran it, the new jobs were created as waiting rather than blocked while the run still recorded that approval was required. Cancelling and re-running stale fork checks is a routine action that does not involve the approval control, so where Actions is enabled and a matching runner is registered, workflow code taken from the fork pull request head could run on the repository's runners without an explicit approval. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104636 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| Gitea validated the initial remote URL for push mirrors, wiki remote checks, and fetches of migrated pull request heads, but the subsequent raw Git operations followed HTTP redirects without revalidating the destination. A repository administrator using a policy-allowed endpoint that redirects could make Gitea's Git client send requests to an address that the outbound host policy would otherwise block. The impact depends on the configured policy and the internal services reachable from the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89199 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to sensitive configuration items via specific database queries. This could allow an authenticated attacker to retrieve administrative credentials for various internal systems, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83535 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openstack | 2026-10-13 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in openstack-network-exporter. When an operator configures user authentication but omits or misconfigures Transport Layer Security (TLS), the basic authentication mechanism is silently bypassed. This fail-open design allows an adjacent network attacker to access sensitive Open vSwitch (OVS) and Open Virtual Network (OVN) dataplane metrics without credentials. Consequently, an attacker can enumerate bridge names, port counters, OVN controller state, and host topology, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78025 | 1 Dell | 2 Policy Manager For Secure Connect Gateway, Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77363 | 1 The-40-thieves | 1 Obsidian-tc | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. Prior to 1.3.1, the Streamable HTTP transport does not validate the Host or Origin header or enable DNS-rebinding protection. When the documented loopback configuration uses auth.mode set to none, a malicious web page can send requests to the local MCP endpoint and receive unrestricted vault access through the http-local caller. Version 1.3.1 fixes the vulnerability by enabling host, origin, and DNS-rebinding validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-74035 | 1 Wazuh | 1 Wazuh | 2026-10-13 | 7.2 High |
| Wazuh versions from 4.6.0 before 4.14.8 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where security.update_user places the reserved user guard and password policy inside a falsy truthiness check. A delegated user administrator can send an empty password to the user update endpoint, bypassing the reserved user guard to take over the wazuh superuser account and authenticate with empty credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59976 | 1 C4illin | 1 Convertx | 2026-10-13 | 8.1 High |
| ConvertX is a self-hosted file conversion service. Prior to 0.18.0, the ImageMagick converter uses the unsanitized convert_to parameter to construct an output path. If an authenticated user, or an unauthenticated user when ConvertX is configured to allow unauthenticated access, uploads an extensionless image and supplies directory traversal sequences in convert_to through /convert, the constructed path escapes the intended output directory, allowing the attacker to write converted output to arbitrary container paths, potentially overwriting files or causing denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 0.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109673 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-10-13 | 7.3 High |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.103.0 and 16.x before 16.12.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because the names of certain records are not properly neutralized when rendered on some dashboards, tools, and portals. Authenticated attackers can craft malicious record names that execute scripts in other users' browsers, enabling data access, modification, and token theft, especially against privileged users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109653 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-10-13 | 7.3 High |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.119.0 and 16.x before 16.31.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because record fields are rendered into an HTML attribute context without escaping. A low-privilege user can store a malicious payload in a record field that executes in the browser of any privileged user who opens the affected page, enabling account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109633 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-10-13 | 8.1 High |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.119.1 and 16.x before 16.32.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because content submitted through a public-facing booking page is stored without neutralization. Unauthenticated attackers can submit crafted content that is rendered as raw HTML in a privileged user's session, executing script to act as that user and take over the account. | ||||