Export limit exceeded: 407426 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 407426 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (407426 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-104083 | 1 Smartertools | 1 Smartermail | 2026-10-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| SmarterMail before build 9777 contains a stored mutation cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows remote attackers to inject executable script by placing payloads inside a <style> element nested within MathML foreign content (<math><mtext><mglyph>), which the custom HTML sanitizer treats as inert CDATA text but browsers reparse as live markup. Attackers can deliver a crafted calendar (iCal) message containing an <img src=x onerror=...> payload that executes automatically in the recipient's webmail session at /interface/message-iframe when the message is opened, enabling script execution and data exfiltration unconstrained by the interface's permissive Content-Security-Policy. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103965 | 1 Mongodb | 1 Mongodb Server | 2026-10-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| An issue in MongoDB Server's aggregation framework can cause certain constant values to be handled incorrectly during internal query rewriting. Under certain conditions, an authenticated user with read access may receive field values in aggregation output that the query did not intend to return. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102982 | 1 Makeplane | 1 Plane | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, the plane comments fail to sanitize unsafe URL schemes stored in comment_html. A project member can store a crafted link in a comment, and attacker-controlled script executes in the browser context of another user who selects the link. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102832 | 2026-10-13 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| JupyterLab is an extensible environment for interactive and reproducible computing, based on the Jupyter Notebook Architecture. From 4.5.7 until 4.5.11 and 4.6.4, the markdownviewer:trust and notebook:trust command-link handlers use tracker.currentWidget to resolve the current Markdown viewer or notebook when the user answers rather than retaining the document whose command button was clicked. If another document becomes current while the prompt is open and the user chooses Trust, JupyterLab marks the second document trusted while leaving the clicked document untrusted. Later command buttons in the incorrectly trusted document run without a prompt, and trusting a notebook marks all cells trusted, saves unsaved edits, and persists the server signature to disk. Applications that bundle JupyterLab, including affected Notebook and JupyterLite releases, inherit the behavior. This issue is fixed in versions 4.5.11 and 4.6.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102250 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | ||
| CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability exists that could allow modified firmware to be uploaded when an authorized admin user begins a firmware update procedure which could result in control over the device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102076 | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product web service does not properly validate user-supplied input in upload code. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102074 | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product FTP service does not properly validate the length of user-controllable input. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71429 | 1 Rvc-boss | 1 Gpt-sovits-webui | 2026-10-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| GPT-SoVITS through 20250606v2pro contains an OS command injection vulnerability in tools/uvr5/vr.py that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute commands via output folder paths. Attackers can enter shell substitutions like $(...) in the UVR5 WebUI output folder textboxes with mp3 or m4a export to run commands as the server user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58390 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| Frappe before 14.81.4 and 15.x before 15.41.0 contains an improper privilege management vulnerability involving a certain document action that permits escalation from the Website User role to System Manager. Authenticated attackers with Website User access can combine this document action with additional steps to obtain administrative System Manager privileges in the Frappe application. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54408 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| Frappe before 13.52.0 and 14.x before 14.31.0 contains an HTML injection vulnerability caused by weak escaping of user-supplied content rendered in pages. Attackers can submit crafted HTML that bypasses the insufficient escaping and is rendered in the browsers of users who view it, enabling cross-site scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37280 | 1 Pelioniot | 1 Cbor-sync | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| cbor-sync through 1.0.4 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in CBOR.decode that trusts declared array and map lengths without checking remaining input. Remote attackers can supply a tiny crafted CBOR payload declaring huge lengths to drive billions of iterations, exhausting CPU and process memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87670 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| An authorization logic vulnerability exists in the Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1 REST API gateway. The internal gate guarding restricted management endpoints relies exclusively on client-controlled HTTP headers. An authenticated user with any valid REST session can spoof these headers to gain unauthorized access to internal management endpoints. This allows low-privilege users to view sensitive chassis metadata, hardware memory patrolling state, and firmware integrity audit logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70357 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| Gitea validates a repository migration hostname against its network allow and block lists before invoking Git, but the Git subprocess independently resolves the hostname when connecting. An attacker who can start a migration and control the destination's DNS can change the address between validation and connection to reach a blocked internal address. The affected path is the Git clone operation; validation in the migration HTTP client's dialer does not protect the independently connecting Git subprocess. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87671 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| An out-of-bounds memory read vulnerability exists in the web management daemon of Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1. Unauthenticated HTTP endpoints process specific URL query parameters without validating array index boundaries or performing numerical range checks. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this issue by sending a single, crafted HTTP request containing extreme numerical values in the query string. This causes an invalid memory dereference, resulting in a crash of the web management process (Denial of Service) and potential temporary management-plane disruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65148 | 2026-10-13 | 7.3 High | ||
| NVIDIA DALI contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a stack-based buffer overflow. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, information disclosure, data tampering, and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65162 | 2026-10-13 | 10 Critical | ||
| NVIDIA AIStore for Linux contains a vulnerability in the legacy ETL Kubernetes PodSpec initialization API where a remote attacker may supply Kubernetes host-namespace and container-security settings. A successful exploit may lead to code execution, privilege escalation, information disclosure, data tampering, and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65110 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Megatron-lm | 2026-10-13 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Megatron-LM contains a vulnerability in checkpoint loading where, an attacker could cause an RCE by convincing a user to load a maliciously crafted file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65104 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Megatron-lm | 2026-10-13 | 7.1 High |
| NVIDIA Megatron-LM for all platforms contains a vulnerability in inference, where an attacker could cause hash collisions in the cache used for inference requests. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to data tampering and partial information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65180 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Megatron-lm | 2026-10-13 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Megatron-LM contains a vulnerability in checkpoint loading where an Attacker may cause an RCE by convincing a user to load a maliciously crafted file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55376 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to 0.0.40, an authenticated user who can create or edit a workflow with an Agent custom Python tool can bypass the blacklist-based sandbox in backend/app/services/python_tool_executor.py because allowed standard-library modules expose operating-system, process, and filesystem capabilities through public attributes that pass _safe_import() and _validate_code_safety(). The runner then executes the supplied tool with exec(), permitting commands and file operations as the backend application user; self-registration affects reachability, but portal triggering alone does not grant code control. This issue is fixed in 0.0.40. | ||||