Export limit exceeded: 403660 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 102928 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (102928 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-104069 | 2 Daniel Brendel, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Hortusfox, Hortusfox | 2026-10-09 | 7.2 High |
| HortusFox before 6.2 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in ThemeModule::startImport() where an uploaded ZIP archive is extracted directly into the public web root before any validation of file names, extensions, or content is performed. An authenticated administrator can upload a crafted theme archive containing a PHP file and an .htaccess file to re-enable execution, then request it under the themes directory to execute arbitrary OS commands as the web-server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106103 | 1 Quasarframework | 2 Icongenie, Quasar | 2026-10-09 | 7.1 High |
| Quasar Framework is a framework for building high-performance Vue.js user interfaces. Prior to @quasar/icongenie 6.1.1, the icongenie generate --profile command accepted folder and name values from a user-supplied profile without constraining the resolved destination to the Quasar project directory. icongenie/lib/utils/get-assets-files.js joined those values with appDir, while icongenie/lib/utils/validate-profile-object.js required only non-empty strings, allowing parent-directory traversal. A developer who runs a crafted profile can cause generated image content to be written or overwritten at any path writable by that user, potentially modifying shell startup files, build scripts, or other executable configuration. This issue is fixed in version 6.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101207 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Integration | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High |
| Dell OpenManage Integration with Microsoft Windows Admin Center, versions prior to 3.7.0, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106439 | 1 Hydra-ecosystem | 1 Hydra | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| Hydra is a framework for elegantly configuring complex applications. From 1.3.4 until 1.3.7 and 1.4.0.dev10, Hydra stores legacy instantiate target blocklists and related execution-policy collections in mutable module-level state. An attacker who controls multiple sibling target entries can resolve hydra._internal.target_policy.UNCONTROLLED_EXECUTION_TARGETS.discard through instantiate(), remove a denied target, and then invoke that target because sibling nodes are processed in insertion order against the same modified policy. The mutation persists in process-global state and can enable code execution with the application's privileges, while a narrow execution whitelist supplied by trusted Python code is not bypassed by the reported direct mutation path. This issue is fixed in versions 1.3.7 and 1.4.0.dev10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82162 | 1 Dell | 1 Command|configure | 2026-10-09 | 7.4 High |
| Dell Command | Configure (DCC), versions prior to 5.2.3.35, contain an Improper Handling of Mixed Encoding vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106440 | 1 Hydra-ecosystem | 1 Hydra | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| Hydra is a framework for elegantly configuring complex applications. From 1.2.0 until 1.3.0 and 1.4.0.dev10, the hydra-optuna-sweeper package accepts a configuration-controlled dotted path in hydra.sweeper.custom_search_space, resolves it with hydra.utils.get_method(), and later invokes the returned callable in the Hydra controller process. Because get_method() is a trusted-input lookup helper and does not apply the execution policy used by instantiate(), an attacker who controls Optuna sweep configuration or command-line overrides can select importable Python code for execution with the application's privileges, including bypassing a trusted execution whitelist on affected Hydra 1.4 development releases. This issue is fixed in versions 1.3.0 and 1.4.0.dev10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106441 | 1 Hydra-ecosystem | 1 Hydra | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| Hydra is a framework for elegantly configuring complex applications. Prior to 1.3.6 and 1.4.0.dev9, Hydra passes Python logging configuration to logging.config.dictConfig() without applying Hydra's target policy to handler class values or formatter, filter, handler, queue, and listener factories. An attacker who controls Hydra logging configuration can therefore select an importable class or factory and cause it to be invoked with the application's privileges, even in versions where instantiate() is protected because the logging path does not use instantiate(). This issue is fixed in versions 1.3.6 and 1.4.0.dev9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106442 | 1 Hydra-ecosystem | 1 Hydra | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| Hydra is a framework for elegantly configuring complex applications. From 1.3.4 until 1.3.6 and 1.4.0.dev9, the instantiate() target blacklist introduced for CVE-2026-68508 incompletely checks the effective callable selected by the target field. Execution wrappers such as timeit.timeit, executable deserialization through pickle.loads, aliases, callable-returning helpers, generic dispatch, and deferred calls can obscure or defer the effective target and bypass name-based authorization. An attacker who causes an application to instantiate untrusted Hydra configuration can use these gaps to execute code with the application's privileges. This issue is fixed in versions 1.3.6 and 1.4.0.dev9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76748 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Aos-switch | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the API of AOS-S. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated read-only user to escalate their privileges and gain administrative access to the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101153 | 1 Arista | 2 Cloudvision Portal, Cloudvision Sensor | 2026-10-09 | 8 High |
| On affected versions of CloudVision Portal (on-premises) or CloudVision Sensor, a path traversal vulnerability exists. An authenticated user with sufficient high privileges could exploit this to extract unintended data from the Sensor. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102155 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Cue | 2026-10-09 | 8.5 High |
| An XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in the WiFi-server Spectralight application allows any authenticated user to send malicious requests, leading to arbitrary local file disclosure and partial denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102160 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Cue | 2026-10-09 | 7.2 High |
| An operating system (OS) command injection vulnerability in CloudVision CUE backup management may allow an authenticated Super User to submit a crafted backup request and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the affected service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102161 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Cue | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High |
| An unauthenticated attacker located on an adjacent private network (or any attacker routed through a reverse proxy/load balancer that forwards client headers) can forge their source IP address and gain administrative session privileges on the CV-CUE backend. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101156 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Cue | 2026-10-09 | 8.4 High |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability may allow an authenticated, high-privilege administrator to store malicious content in a configuration. The content may execute in another authenticated user's browser when that user views or compares the affected configuration. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to act through the victim's authenticated browser session to access sensitive data, modify configurations, or disrupt managed wireless services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101157 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Cue | 2026-10-09 | 8.7 High |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated attacker with adjacent-network access to inject malicious content that executes when an authenticated user views affected content. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to compromise the victim's authenticated browser session, access sensitive data, modify system state, or disrupt affected services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102162 | 1 Arista | 1 Wi-fi Access Points | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High |
| On affected Arista Wi-Fi access points with captive portal, or application firewall enabled on at least one SSID, a vulnerability in the wireless gateway service could allow an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker to send a crafted packet that triggers a stack overflow, resulting in a denial-of-service condition or potentially execute arbitrary code on the device. The wireless gateway service is automatically restarted after a crash, allowing repeated exploitation attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102163 | 1 Arista | 1 Wi-fi Access Points | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High |
| On affected Arista access points with Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (WIPS) active, an unauthenticated attacker within radio frequency (RF) proximity can send a crafted frame to crash the sensor service, disabling WIPS monitoring on the access point, or potentially achieve remote code execution. No wireless association or authentication is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102167 | 1 Arista | 1 Wi-fi Access Points | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| On affected Arista Wi-Fi access points, a memory corruption vulnerability exists in access point's wired uplink network endpoints. An unauthenticated attacker can crash the sensor service or potentially achieve remote code execution. Exploitation requires the attacker to be on the same network segment as the access point's wired uplink. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102165 | 1 Arista | 1 Wi-fi Access Points | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| On affected Arista Wi-Fi access points, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the capture service can send a crafted packet to cause the service to crash or potentially achieve remote code execution. This exploit requires an uncommonly used non-default streaming mode. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101258 | 2 Ghostscript, Redhat | 2 Ghostscript, Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in Ghostscript. When Ghostscript renders a crafted PostScript or EPS document, it can bypass the -dSAFER sandbox and execute arbitrary shell commands in the context of the Ghostscript process. The issue chains memory corruption in document parsing with disabling of internal path access controls at runtime. An attacker can deliver the document directly or through formats that delegate rendering to Ghostscript (for example EPS import or print conversion workflows). Successful exploitation can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data accessible to the process running Ghostscript. | ||||