Export limit exceeded: 410712 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 410712 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (410712 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-34118 | 1 Tp-link | 3 Tapo C520ws, Tapo C520ws Firmware, Tapo C520ws V2 | 2026-10-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability was identified in TP-Link Tapo C100/C101 v5, C210 v3.6 and C520WS v2.6 in the HTTP POST body parsing logic due to missing validation of remaining buffer capacity after dynamic allocation, due to insufficient boundary validation when handling externally supplied HTTP input. An attacker on the same network segment could trigger heap memory corruption conditions by sending crafted payloads that cause write operations beyond allocated buffer boundaries. Successful exploitation causes a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition, causing the device’s process to crash or become unresponsive. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112360 | 1 Netis | 1 Eap930 | 2026-10-19 | 8 High |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Netis EAP930 1.250905.115454. This issue affects the function return200 of the file /cgi-bin/debug of the component CGI Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument SIGNATURE leads to backdoor. The attack may be initiated remotely. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97829 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in DNS Server allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112283 | 1 Videolan | 1 Libbluray | 2026-10-19 | 5.5 Medium |
| VideoLAN libbluray through 1.5.1 contains an uncontrolled memory allocation vulnerability in _parse_extent_start_points() in clpi_parse.c that trusts the num_point field without bounds checking. Attackers can supply a crafted .clpi file on a disc, image, or directory with a huge num_point to exhaust memory and CPU, causing denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112285 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia | 2026-10-19 | 4.3 Medium |
| Thelia before 3.1.5 and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 contains a business logic vulnerability that allows authenticated customers to bypass coupon usage limits because usage is counted only when orders become paid. Attackers can place multiple pay-later orders while a usage remains, or cancel paid orders to inflate max_usage, gaining unlimited discounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112286 | 1 Krayin | 1 Laravel-crm | 2026-10-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| Krayin CRM before 2.2.7 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows scope-restricted authenticated users to read other users' quotes by bypassing per-user data scope checks in QuoteController. Attackers can query the quotes search and lead-products endpoints to retrieve quote addresses, totals, contact details, and product pricing belonging to any user or lead. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111748 | 1 Aio-libs | 1 Aiohttp | 2026-10-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, an attacker can send an absolute-form request that causes Request.scheme to use attacker-controlled request-target scheme data instead of the connection protocol. Applications that use Request.scheme for security decisions can consequently be tricked into treating an unencrypted connection as encrypted or an encrypted connection as unencrypted. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110676 | 1 Rurban | 1 Cpanel::json::xs | 2026-10-19 | N/A |
| Cpanel::JSON::XS versions before 4.80 for Perl allow memory exhaustion by encoding exponent notation as full decimal digits under allow_bignum. With allow_bignum, a JSON number with a fraction or exponent decodes to a Math::BigFloat, which stores the exponent separately and so decodes cheaply. Encoding it untyped or as JSON_TYPE_FLOAT writes the plain decimal form with one digit per unit of exponent. Nothing bounds the exponent, so the 12-byte text [1e30000000] encodes to 30 MB. Untrusted JSON decoded with allow_bignum and encoded again can exhaust memory and CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110684 | 1 Rurban | 1 Cpanel::json::xs | 2026-10-19 | N/A |
| Cpanel::JSON::XS versions from 3.0202 before 4.80 for Perl leak memory and retain overloaded objects when encoding values as strings in encode_stringify. encode_stringify writes a value in its string form under allow_stringify, under convert_blessed for objects without TO_JSON, and under allow_bignum. For an array or hash object with a "" overload, and from 4.20 a scalar object, it takes an extra reference that is never released, so the object and everything it references are never freed. From 4.10 it also never frees its copy of the string. Repeatedly encoding data that contains such values grows process memory without bound. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110686 | 1 Rurban | 1 Cpanel::json::xs | 2026-10-19 | N/A |
| Cpanel::JSON::XS versions before 4.80 for Perl use freed filter callbacks when a filter removes itself during decoding in decode_hv. A decode copies the parser's filter_json_object and filter_json_single_key_object callbacks without taking references to them. A filter callback that removes the last single-key filter frees the callback table while the decode in progress still uses it. The next object is dispatched through freed memory and can crash the process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76787 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-10-19 | 5.9 Medium |
| The UpdateHub firmware-over-the-air client parses the CoAP probe response with Zephyr's JSON library in z_impl_updatehub_probe() (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c). The decoder treats every descriptor field as optional — json_obj_parse() returns a bitmask of the fields it actually decoded and never fails on a missing one — so a response that omits the "sha256sum" string leaves the corresponding const char * in the zero-initialised struct resp_probe_any_boards / struct resp_probe_some_boards at NULL. Both metadata branches then computed sha256size = strlen(...objects.sha256sum) + 1 before any validation, dereferencing that NULL pointer; the SHA256_HEX_DIGEST_SIZE test that follows operates on a value the bad read has already produced and cannot prevent it. The metadata is supplied entirely by the network peer: probe_cb() accepts the datagram, runs coap_packet_parse() and copies the payload with no token matching and no cryptographic check. With CONFIG_UPDATEHUB_DTLS unset — the default — start_coap_client() uses plain CoAP over UDP on port 5683 with no peer authentication and resolves the server via unauthenticated DNS, so an on-path attacker, a DNS spoofer, or an off-path attacker who wins the race with a forged source address can deliver the malformed metadata. A probe response as simple as "objects":[[{}],[{}]] suffices, and no user interaction is required because updatehub_autohandler() polls on CONFIG_UPDATEHUB_POLL_INTERVAL. When CONFIG_UPDATEHUB_DTLS=y the trigger narrows to a malicious or compromised update server. The primitive is a read at address zero, not a write, so the impact is availability only. On targets where the low address range is unmapped or protected — MMU-based architectures, builds with CONFIG_NULL_POINTER_EXCEPTION_DETECTION_DWT/_MPU/_PMP, TrustZone non-secure images, and SoCs such as nRF54L whose 0x0–0x400 window is unmapped — the load faults and Zephyr's default fatal handler halts the system, giving a remotely re-triggerable denial of service on every poll. On classic Cortex-M targets where the vector table is readable at address zero the walk usually terminates immediately and the request is rejected by the length check, so the outcome is configuration- and SoC-dependent. There is no memory write, and the copied bytes are only compared against the locally computed image hash, so there is no information-disclosure channel. The fix adds an explicit sha256sum == NULL test that returns UPDATEHUB_METADATA_ERROR ahead of the strlen() in both metadata branches. Debug builds (CONFIG_UPDATEHUB_LOG_LEVEL=4) still format the same pointers with %s in a LOG_DBG() loop that runs before the new checks, so that variant remains in debug configurations only. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76788 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-10-19 | 8.8 High |
| The OSDP Control Panel reply parser cp_decode_response() in subsys/mgmt/osdp/src/osdp_cp.c decodes replies from a Peripheral Device into a stack-allocated struct osdp_event. For the REPLY_KEYPPAD and REPLY_RAW reply types, the payload length is taken from the received frame and the only validation performed is that the declared length is self-consistent with the number of payload bytes present in the frame. Because the attacker controls both the length field and the frame length, that check imposes no bound, and the subsequent memcpy() writes into the fixed 64-byte data arrays of struct osdp_event_keypress / struct osdp_event_cardread (OSDP_EVENT_MAX_DATALEN). The sibling REPLY_FMT handler in the same switch already carried the missing > OSDP_EVENT_MAX_DATALEN bound. The defect is reached from cp_process_reply(), which reads bytes from the OSDP RS-485 channel and passes them through osdp_phy_check_packet() and osdp_phy_decode_packet() before dispatching on the reply ID. Triggering it requires CONFIG_OSDP with CONFIG_OSDP_MODE_CP and an application event callback registered (the normal Control Panel integration), plus a frame carrying a correct SOM, a valid CRC-16, and a matching 2-bit sequence number — all of which are computable or observable by anyone on the bus. No check ties the reply ID to the outstanding command, so an oversized REPLY_KEYPPAD or REPLY_RAW is accepted as the answer to a routine CMD_POLL. A malicious or compromised card reader, or anyone with access to the RS-485 wiring, can supply such a frame; CONFIG_OSDP_SC_ENABLED only helps while a secure channel is active, and a single unauthenticated frame carrying a bad MAC causes sc_deactivate(), after which plaintext replies are again accepted. With the default CONFIG_OSDP_UART_BUFFER_LENGTH of 256, roughly 180 bytes of fully attacker-chosen data can be written past the end of the stack-allocated event object, over saved registers and the return address on typical Cortex-M and RISC-V frame layouts (Zephyr does not enable stack canaries by default). The impact ranges from a hard crash of the access-control panel to potential control-flow hijack in the context of the OSDP receive thread. The fix adds an OSDP_EVENT_MAX_DATALEN bound to both handlers, capping each memcpy() at the size of its destination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105815 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| TP-Link Tapo C210 V3.60 may expose shared credential material and cryptographic metadata through unauthenticated DS JSON API requests. The exposed shared credential can be accepted by the Streamd Digest authentication mechanism as an administrative password, allowing an unauthenticated adjacent-network attacker to establish encrypted media sessions without knowledge of the device account password. Successful exploitation may disclose credential and cryptographic material and allow unauthorized access to encrypted media sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105814 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| TP-Link Tapo C210 V3.60 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the DS JSON API. A crafted JSON request containing both a protected operation and public onboarding-related fields may cause module-level authorization checks to be applied inconsistently, allowing protected camera operations, including pan-tilt-zoom control, to be executed without a valid authenticated session. Successful exploitation may allow an unauthenticated attacker on the adjacent network to perform protected camera operations, including pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) control, without a valid authenticated session. This could result in unauthorized manipulation of camera functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54657 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54656 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54655 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54654 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54653 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54652 | 2026-10-19 | N/A | ||
| This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues. | ||||