Export limit exceeded: 10934 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10934 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1097 | 1 Ibm | 1 Emptoris Strategic Supply Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Emptoris Strategic Supply Management Platform 10.0.0.x through 10.1.1.x is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 120657. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10961 | 1 Vanderbilt | 1 Redcap | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| REDCap before 7.5.1 has CSRF in the deletion feature of the File Repository and File Upload components. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10678 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to delete permalinks via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10677 | 1 Linksys | 2 Ea4500, Ea4500 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists on Linksys EA4500 devices with Firmware Version before 2.1.41.164606, as demonstrated by a request to apply.cgi to disable SIP. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10681 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to unlock albums via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10680 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to change a private album to public via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000093 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Poll Scm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Poll SCM Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to initiate polling of projects with a known name. While Jenkins in general does not consider polling to be a protection-worthy action as it's similar to cache invalidation, the plugin specifically adds a permission to be able to use this functionality, and this issue undermines that permission. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000092 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Git, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Git Plugin connects to a user-specified Git repository as part of form validation. An attacker with no direct access to Jenkins but able to guess at a username/password credentials ID could trick a developer with job configuration permissions into following a link with a maliciously crafted Jenkins URL which would result in the Jenkins Git client sending the username and password to an attacker-controlled server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000091 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GitHub Branch Source Plugin connects to a user-specified GitHub API URL (e.g. GitHub Enterprise) as part of form validation and completion (e.g. to verify Scan Credentials are correct). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to any web server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000069 | 1 Oauth2 Proxy Project | 1 Oauth2 Proxy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF in Bitly oauth2_proxy 2.1 during authentication flow | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000008 | 1 Chyrp-lite Project | 1 Chyrp Lite | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Chyrp Lite version 2016.04 is vulnerable to a CSRF in the user settings function allowing attackers to hijack the authentication of logged in users to modify account information, including their password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0902 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| RubyGems version 2.6.12 and earlier is vulnerable to a DNS hijacking vulnerability that allows a MITM attacker to force the RubyGems client to download and install gems from a server that the attacker controls. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9092 | 1 Symantec | 2 Content Analysis, Mail Threat Defense | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8941 | 1 Ibm | 2 Spectrum Control, Tivoli Storage Productivity Center | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8917 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Selling And Fulfillment Foundation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sterling Order Management 9.2 - 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 2000943. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8737 | 1 Apache | 1 Brooklyn | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Brooklyn before 0.10.0, the REST server is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF), which could permit a malicious web site to produce a link which, if clicked whilst a user is logged in to Brooklyn, would cause the server to execute the attacker's commands as the user. There is known to be a proof-of-concept exploit using this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8718 | 1 Moxa | 2 Awk-3131a, Awk-3131a Firmware | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| An exploitable Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in the Web Application functionality of Moxa AWK-3131A Wireless Access Point running firmware 1.1. A specially crafted form can trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server which will be treated as an authentic request. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6897 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wp_ajax_update_plugin function in wp-admin/includes/ajax-actions.php in WordPress before 4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of subscribers for /dev/random read operations by leveraging a late call to the check_ajax_referer function, a related issue to CVE-2016-6896. | ||||