Export limit exceeded: 404393 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 404393 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 404393 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 404393 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (404393 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78023 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 7.1 High |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78024 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 7.7 High |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, Server-side request forgery, and Unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78025 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 7.5 High |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78026 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78027 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 5.8 Medium |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Server-side request forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78339 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 6.3 Medium |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78340 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 6.3 Medium |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution and Filesystem access for attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78341 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108576 | 1 Tozed | 1 X300 | 2026-10-11 | 10 Critical |
| A vulnerability was found in TOZED X300 up to 6.01.3. This vulnerability affects the function process_ping of the component IPPingDiagnostics Handler. The manipulation of the argument Host results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107825 | 1 Coraza | 1 Coraza | 2026-10-11 | 4 Medium |
| OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.0.0 until 3.8.0, ProcessURI in internal/corazawaf/transaction.go handles a url.ParseRequestURI failure by retaining the raw URI but leaving QUERY_STRING, ARGS_GET, ARGS_GET_NAMES, and the GET-derived portion of ARGS empty. An unauthenticated attacker can place control bytes in a URI passed directly by integrations such as coraza-spoa, coraza-proxy-wasm, custom FFI hosts, or WASM hosts, causing Coraza to omit query parameters that the downstream integration may still process and allowing rules targeting those variables to be bypassed. The bundled coraza/v3/http integration is not affected because Go net/http rejects such malformed request targets before calling Coraza. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107826 | 1 Coraza | 1 Coraza | 2026-10-11 | 7.5 High |
| OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.0.0 until 3.8.1, readJSON in internal/bodyprocessors/json.go can stop its bounded flattening walk after reaching SecArgumentsLimit or the byte budget and then call gjson.Valid on the complete raw body. An unauthenticated attacker can submit shallow values followed by an extremely deeply nested JSON tail that was not visited by the bounded walk, causing gjson.Valid to recurse without a depth bound and terminate the hosting process with an unrecoverable fatal stack overflow. The ProcessRequest and ProcessResponse JSON paths share the affected readJSON validation flow, and the payload can remain within recommended body-size and argument-count limits. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107833 | 1 Coraza | 1 Coraza | 2026-10-11 | 5.9 Medium |
| OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.0.0 until 3.8.0, ProcessResponse in internal/bodyprocessors/json.go passes the ignoreJSONRecursionLimit value of -1 to readJSON, while the recursive guard only stops at zero. A network attacker who can cause an application protected by Coraza to return deeply nested JSON can make response-body processing perform quadratic work, consuming one CPU core for seconds per response within the default ResponseBodyLimit. Request JSON processing is not affected by this specific path because it uses the configured request recursion limit, and exploitation requires response-body inspection to be enabled. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107834 | 1 Coraza | 1 Coraza | 2026-10-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.0.0 until 3.8.0, the multipart loop in internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go executes defer temp.Close() for every uploaded file part, so each temporary-file descriptor remains open until the complete request returns. An unauthenticated attacker can submit a multipart body containing many minimal file parts and exhaust the process file-descriptor table within the request-body size limit, causing os.CreateTemp failures, MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR responses, blocked legitimate uploads, and process-wide inability to open files or sockets. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107835 | 1 Coraza | 1 Coraza | 2026-10-11 | 4 Medium |
| OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. Prior to 3.8.1, internal/cookies.ParseCookies in internal/cookies/cookies.go handles boundary ASCII control characters and control-only or empty cookie names differently from several backend cookie parsers. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a Cookie header so Coraza indexes or drops a cookie under a different name or value from the backend application, causing rules targeting REQUEST_COOKIES or REQUEST_COOKIES_NAMES to miss application-visible attacker data. Exploitation depends on the backend parser and affected rule scope, and interior control characters with inconsistent backend behavior are outside this advisory's remediation. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108575 | 1 Litellm | 1 Litellm | 2026-10-11 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in BerriAI LiteLLM up to 1.94.0. This affects the function get_secret of the file secret_managers/main.py of the component Secret Resolution. The manipulation of the argument api_key leads to improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106138 | 1 Progress | 1 Kendoreact | 2026-10-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| In Progress® KendoReact (@progress/kendo-react-charts) starting with version 1.1.0 and prior to 16.2.0, the default Chart tooltip renders the formatted point value as raw HTML without encoding, in both the single-point and the shared tooltip. An attacker with low privileges who can influence a string value bound to the chart can supply HTML containing event handlers that execute JavaScript in a user's browser when the user hovers over the affected data point. Successful exploitation can compromise the confidentiality and integrity of data accessible to the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106139 | 1 Progress | 1 Kendo Ui For Vue | 2026-10-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| In Progress® Kendo UI for Vue (@progress/kendo-vue-charts) starting with version 2.5.0 and prior to 16.2.0, the default Chart tooltip renders the formatted point value as raw HTML without encoding, in both the single-point and the shared tooltip. An attacker with low privileges who can influence a string value bound to the chart can supply HTML containing event handlers that execute JavaScript in a user's browser when the user hovers over the affected data point. Successful exploitation can compromise the confidentiality and integrity of data accessible to the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108605 | 1 Jeecg | 2 Jeecg Boot, Jeecgboot | 2026-10-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the AiOcrController updateById handler that allows any authenticated user to modify global OCR templates. Low-privileged attackers can send PUT requests to /airag/ocr/edit to overwrite LLM prompts in the shared airag:ocr Redis key, corrupting OCR results for all users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108607 | 1 Jeecg | 2 Jeecg Boot, Jeecgboot | 2026-10-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated users to delete other users' AI video generation records by supplying arbitrary userId values to DELETE /airag/video/deleteVideoRecord. Attackers can obtain record ids from the unchecked GET /airag/video/listByUser endpoint and delete victims' Redis-stored video history entries one record per request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108618 | 1 Jeecg | 2 Jeecg Boot, Jeecgboot | 2026-10-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated users to modify message templates via PUT /sys/message/sysMessageTemplate/edit. Attackers can obtain template ids from the unguarded list endpoint and overwrite system notification titles and content, delivering attacker-supplied text or links to other users. | ||||