Export limit exceeded: 10909 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10909 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12541 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Chative Live chat and Chatbot plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the add_chative_widget_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the channel ID or organization ID via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This could lead to redirecting the live chat widget to an attacker-controlled channel. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25234 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| SmartHouse Webapp 6.5.33 contains multiple cross-site request forgery and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions. Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities by tricking logged-in users into visiting malicious websites or injecting malicious scripts into various application parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12288 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Simple add pages or posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10095 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4616 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Prisma Browser | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser’s security controls. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25238 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| V-SOL GPON/EPON OLT Platform 2.03 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to create admin users, enable SSH, or modify system settings by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a specially crafted page. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25247 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Beward N100 H.264 VGA IP Camera M2.1.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to add an admin user by tricking a logged-in user into submitting the form. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25250 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Devolo dLAN 500 AV Wireless+ 3.1.0-1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that trigger unauthorized configuration changes by exploiting predictable URL actions when a logged-in user visits the site. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25259 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Leica Geosystems GR10/GR25/GR30/GR50 GNSS 4.30.063 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can trick logged-in users into executing unauthorized actions by crafting malicious web pages that submit requests to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41723 | 1 Sauter | 2 Ey-modulo 5 Devices, Modulo 6 Devices | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The importFile SOAP method is vulnerable to a directory traversal attack. An unauthenticated remote attacker bypass the path restriction and upload files to arbitrary locations. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36839 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59845 | 1 Apollographql | 2 Apollo Explorer, Apollo Sandbox | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43930 | 2 Eyecix, Wordpress | 2 Jobsearch, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eyecix JobSearch allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects JobSearch: from n/a through 2.5.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2420 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in 猫宁i Morning up to bc782730c74ff080494f145cc363a0b4f43f7d3e. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25056 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11071 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability in local API server of DestinyECM solution(versions described below) which is developed and maintained by Cyberdigm may allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, which probabilistically enables JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) via forgery web page.* Due to product customization, version information may differ from the following version description. For further inquiries, please contact the vendor. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60168 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in integrationshotelrunner HotelRunner Booking Widget hotelrunner allows Stored XSS.This issue affects HotelRunner Booking Widget: from n/a through <= 1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60075 | 2 Allegro Marketing, Wordpress | 2 Hpb Seo Plugin For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress hpbseo allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects hpb seo plugin for WordPress: from n/a through <= 3.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42937 | 1 Sap | 1 Sapsprint | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| SAP Print Service (SAPSprint) performs insufficient validation of path information provided by users. An unauthenticated attacker could traverse to the parent directory and over-write system files causing high impact on confidentiality integrity and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42908 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver Application Server For Abap | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Due to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP, an authenticated attacker could initiate transactions directly via the session manager, bypassing the first transaction screen and the associated authorization check. This vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform actions and execute transactions that would normally require specific permissions, compromising the integrity and confidentiality of the system by enabling unauthorized access to restricted functionality. There is no impact to availability from this vulnerability. | ||||