Export limit exceeded: 407331 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 407331 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (407331 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-108381 | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High | ||
| dataclasses-avroschema generates Avro schemas from Python dataclasses, Pydantic models, and Faust Records and generates Python code from Avro schemas. From version 0.44.0 through 0.70.5, the Pydantic and AvroDantic model generators insert a schema field's pydantic-class value after pydantic. in a generated field annotation without safely restricting the expression. Because annotations are evaluated when the generated module is imported, a crafted value can execute arbitrary Python code. Version 0.70.6 fixes the vulnerability by restricting the value to a bare name or a call to a bare name with literal arguments. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108379 | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High | ||
| dataclasses-avroschema generates Avro schemas from Python dataclasses, Pydantic models, and Faust Records and generates Python code from Avro schemas. From version 0.38.0 through 0.70.5, BaseGenerator.parse_fixed inserts a fixed type's namespace value between quotes inside a generated types.confixed annotation without escaping or validating it. A crafted quote can terminate the namespace string and alter the surrounding annotation expression, which Python evaluates when the generated class is defined, allowing arbitrary code execution. Version 0.70.6 fixes the vulnerability by requiring the namespace to be a dot-separated sequence of valid Avro names. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16516 | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssl | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssh | 2026-10-13 | 7.4 High |
| wolfSSH does not validate that the ECDSA curve identifier in a KEXDH_REPLY host key blob matches the algorithm negotiated during key exchange. In ParseECCPubKey() (src/internal.c), the blob's algorithm string is used to derive the curve via NameToId/wcPrimeForId without checking against the negotiated ssh->handshake->pubKeyId, and the RFC 5656 curve identifier string is discarded via GetSkip() rather than compared. An active network man-in-the-middle attacker can substitute a host key blob containing a different ECDSA curve, causing the client to import the key on the wrong curve. Because the attacker controls the private key for the substituted curve, signature verification passes. Exploitation requires an active MitM position and a lax public key check callback (e.g., TOFU, algorithm-name-only check, or fingerprint match against the parsed key). | ||||
| CVE-2026-23707 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.11, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4 may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23706 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager | 2026-10-13 | 5.9 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.11, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiManager 7.2 all versions may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23705 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiManager 7.2 all versions may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2020-9287 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient Emergency Management Server, Forticlientems | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| A untrusted search path vulnerability in Fortinet may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via network exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2020-9290 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Forticlient, Forticlient Virtual Private Network, Forticlientwindows | 2026-10-13 | 7.1 High |
| A untrusted search path vulnerability in Fortinet may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via network exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2019-5589 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlientwindows | 2026-10-13 | 8.6 High |
| A untrusted search path vulnerability in Fortinet may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via network exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2020-12811 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2026-10-13 | 4.9 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of script-related html tags in a web page (basic xss) vulnerability in Fortinet may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via network exploitable | ||||
| CVE-2026-106171 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimanager, Fortimanagercloud | 2026-10-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted packets | ||||
| CVE-2026-81535 | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssl | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssh | 2026-10-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| In wolfSSH through 1.5.0 built with --enable-fwd, DoChannelOpen() in src/internal.c gates only direct-tcpip channel opens with the forwarding policy callback. forwarded-tcpip opens are admitted without an authorization check and are not capped in number, allowing a malicious SSH peer to make an endpoint allocate unbounded per-channel buffers for forwarding channels the application never authorized. A client also does not check a forwarded-tcpip open against the forwards it registered with a tcpip-forward request, as RFC 4254 section 7.2 requires, so a malicious server can open forwarding channels for addresses and ports the client never asked it to forward. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105445 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | ||
| An Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Docker Hub's account-to-organization conversion feature allowed an authenticated attacker to reassign a personal access token (PAT) they controlled to another Docker Hub user without rotating or revoking the token secret. The unchanged PAT then authenticated to the registry as the recipient and could pull, push, or delete images, within its scopes, in repositories accessible to that user, including organization repositories. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108378 | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High | ||
| dataclasses-avroschema generates Avro schemas from Python dataclasses, Pydantic models, and Faust Records and generates Python code from Avro schemas. From version 0.40.0 through 0.70.5, ClassRepresentation.render_docstring copies a schema record's doc value into a generated triple-double-quoted class docstring without escaping quotes or backslashes. A crafted triple-quote sequence can close the docstring and inject statements into the generated class body, while a trailing backslash can escape the generated closing delimiter, allowing Python code execution during module import. Version 0.70.6 fixes the vulnerability by escaping quotes, backslashes, and unsafe control characters before rendering docstrings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83540 | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssl | 2 Wolfssh, Wolfssh | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| When password or public key authentication is used with the Windows port of wolfSSHd, the Windows logon token acquired for one authenticated connection is not released before a token is acquired for a subsequent connection, resulting in user login poisoning between connections. A less privileged user with a valid account on the server can exploit this to force a login as a more privileged user. The vulnerability was introduced with the initial Windows port of wolfSSHd in wolfSSH version 1.4.15 and affects all versions through 1.5.0. Non-Windows builds of wolfSSHd are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11731 | 1 Netgear | 3 Rax28, Rax29, Rax30 | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in the listed NETGEAR RAX series models allows an unauthenticated attacker with adjacent access to the affected device’s management service to access certain device information or modify administrative settings. This vulnerability may impact the confidentiality and integrity of management data and the availability of device-management functions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11732 | 1 Netgear | 4 Cax30, Rax30, Rax5 and 1 more | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| An insufficient input validation vulnerability in the website blocking feature (Block Sites) of the listed NETGEAR router models allows a network-adjacent attacker having network access (such as WiFi credentials) to run unauthorized commands on the router. This vulnerability could affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected router. It applies only when the Block Sites feature is turned on. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107917 | 1 Netgear | 1 R7300dst | 2026-10-13 | 4.5 Medium |
| Insufficient input validation vulnerability in the PPPoE Setup feature of NETGEAR R7300 router allows authenticated administrators connected to the local network to perform unauthorized actions on the router. This issue was identified through testing in a controlled research environment using a simulated version of the router's software and has not been confirmed on physical production devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81507 | 1 Espressif | 1 Esp-idf | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. Prior to 5.2.8, 5.3.6, 5.5.5, 6.0.3, and 6.1-rc1, ESP-IDF BlueDroid L2CAP configuration-option processing in l2c_main.c and l2c_utils.c does not consistently validate option lengths against the remaining received packet bytes. A remote unauthenticated BR/EDR peer within radio range can send a malformed L2CAP configuration request that causes an out-of-bounds read, and under some runtime conditions limited adjacent Bluetooth stack memory can be included in an outbound L2CAP Configuration Response. The issue affects ESP32-class products using the BlueDroid host stack with Classic Bluetooth enabled. This issue is fixed in 5.2.8, 5.3.6, 5.5.5, 6.0.3, and 6.1-rc1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108184 | 1 Zoom Communications | 1 Zoom Clients | 2026-10-13 | 7.4 High |
| Improper certificate validation in certain Zoom Clients for Windows may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct an information disclosure via network access. | ||||