Search
Search Results (127 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-17189 | 7 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 4 more | 14 Http Server, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Apache HTTP server versions 2.4.37 and prior, by sending request bodies in a slow loris way to plain resources, the h2 stream for that request unnecessarily occupied a server thread cleaning up that incoming data. This affects only HTTP/2 (mod_http2) connections. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12536 | 3 Eclipse, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Jetty, Retail Xstore Point Of Service, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Eclipse Jetty Server, all 9.x versions, on webapps deployed using default Error Handling, when an intentionally bad query arrives that doesn't match a dynamic url-pattern, and is eventually handled by the DefaultServlet's static file serving, the bad characters can trigger a java.nio.file.InvalidPathException which includes the full path to the base resource directory that the DefaultServlet and/or webapp is using. If this InvalidPathException is then handled by the default Error Handler, the InvalidPathException message is included in the error response, revealing the full server path to the requesting system. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11797 | 4 Apache, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 1 more | 4 Pdfbox, Fedora, Retail Xstore Point Of Service and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| In Apache PDFBox 1.8.0 to 1.8.15 and 2.0.0RC1 to 2.0.11, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an extremely long running computation when parsing the page tree. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11763 | 5 Apache, Canonical, Netapp and 2 more | 11 Http Server, Ubuntu Linux, Storage Automation Store and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.34, by sending continuous, large SETTINGS frames a client can occupy a connection, server thread and CPU time without any connection timeout coming to effect. This affects only HTTP/2 connections. A possible mitigation is to not enable the h2 protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2018-10237 | 3 Google, Oracle, Redhat | 21 Guava, Banking Payments, Communications Ip Service Activator and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| Unbounded memory allocation in Google Guava 11.0 through 24.x before 24.1.1 allows remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks against servers that depend on this library and deserialize attacker-provided data, because the AtomicDoubleArray class (when serialized with Java serialization) and the CompoundOrdering class (when serialized with GWT serialization) perform eager allocation without appropriate checks on what a client has sent and whether the data size is reasonable. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7658 | 6 Debian, Eclipse, Hp and 3 more | 21 Debian Linux, Jetty, Xp P9000 and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7657 | 6 Debian, Eclipse, Hp and 3 more | 20 Debian Linux, Jetty, Xp P9000 and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. | ||||