| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cgi-bin/users.cgi in Brickcom FB-100Ap, WCB-100Ap, MD-100Ap, WFB-100Ap, OB-100Ae, OSD-040E, and possibly other camera models with firmware 3.1.0.8 and earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users. |
| BlackBerry Link before 1.2.1.31 on Windows and before 1.1.1 build 39 on Mac OS X does not require authentication for remote file-access folders, which allows remote attackers to read or create arbitrary files via IPv6 WebDAV requests, as demonstrated by a CSRF attack involving DNS rebinding. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/update.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify arbitrary user accounts via an edit user action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RiteCMS 1.0.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via an edit user action to cms/index.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Sharetronix 3.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change configuration settings or (2) create new administrative users via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1 FP8 through 11.0 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Global Site Selector (GSS) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuh42164. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Solution, as used in Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing and Unified MeetingPlace, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCui45209 and CSCui44674. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the IndiaNIC Testimonial plugin 2.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a testimonial via an iNIC_testimonial_save action; (2) add a listing template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_listing_template action; (3) add a widget template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_widget action; insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (4) project_name, (5) project_url, (6) client_name, (7) client_city, (8) client_state, (9) description, (10) tags, (11) video_url, or (12) is_featured, (13) title, (14) widget_title, (15) no_of_testimonials, (16) filter_by_country, (17) filter_by_tags, or (18) widget_template parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. |
| inc/central.class.php in GLPI before 0.84.2 does not attempt to make install/install.php unavailable after an installation is completed, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, and (1) perform a SQL injection via an Etape_4 action or (2) execute arbitrary PHP code via an update_1 action. |
| Coursemill Learning Management System (LMS) 6.8 constructs secret tokens based on time values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via vectors related to cookies, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3605. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DSL-2740B Gateway with firmware EU_1.00 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable or disable Wireless MAC Address Filters via a wlFltMode action to wlmacflt.cmd, (2) enable or disable firewall protections via a request to scdmz.cmd, or (3) enable or disable remote management via a save action to scsrvcntr.cmd. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in set_users.cgi in Conceptronic CIPCAMPTIWL Camera 1.0 with firmware 21.37.2.49 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admBase/login.page in the Admin module in JForum allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the user group permissions of arbitrary users via a groupsSave action. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Fat Free CRM before 0.12.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, related to the lack of a protect_from_forgery line in app/controllers/application_controller.rb. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the retrospam component in wp-admin/options-discussion.php in WordPress 2.0.11 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that move comments to the moderation list. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ProjectForge before 5.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via vectors related to (1) web/admin/, (2) web/core/, (3) web/dialog/, (4) web/fibu/, (5) web/mobile/, (6) web/task/, or (7) web/wicket/. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Opsview before 4.4.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in D-Link DAP-2253 Access Point (Rev. A1) with firmware before 1.30 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify configuration settings via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/profile/index.php in Moodle through 2.2.11, 2.3.x before 2.3.11, 2.4.x before 2.4.8, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete (1) categories or (2) fields. |