Export limit exceeded: 404140 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1035 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-9438 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The SEUR Oficial plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'change_service' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.11 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32192 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Apiserver | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in which unauthenticated cross-site scripting (XSS) in the API Server's public API endpoint can be exploited, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the victim browser | ||||
| CVE-2024-55354 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Lucee before 5.4.7.3 LTS and 6 before 6.1.1.118, when an attacker can place files on the server, is vulnerable to a protection mechanism failure that can let an attacker run code that would be expected to be blocked and access resources that would be expected to be protected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39161 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability in WP Discussion Board Discussion Board allows Content Spoofing, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Discussion Board: from n/a through 2.4.8. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53883 | 1 Suse | 4 Container Suse Manager 5.0, Manager, Manager Server and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability allows attackers to run arbitrary javascript via a reflected XSS issue in the search fields.This issue affects Container suse/manager/5.0/x86_64/server:latest: from ? before 5.0.28-150600.3.36.8; SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3: from ? before 4.3.88-150400.3.113.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53882 | 1 Suse | 1 Opensuse Tumbleweed | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium |
| A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in the logrotate configuration for openSUSE mailman3 package allows the mailman user to sent SIGHUP to arbitrary processes. This issue affects openSUSE Tumbleweed: from ? before 3.3.10-2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47513 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability in ARI Soft ARI Stream Quiz allows Code Injection.This issue affects ARI Stream Quiz: from n/a through 1.3.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60244 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability in RealMag777 TableOn posts-table-filterable allows Code Injection.This issue affects TableOn: from n/a through <= 1.0.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10038 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WP-Strava plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 2.12.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0131 | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| NVIDIA GPU kernel driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where a potential user-mode attacker could read a buffer with an incorrect length. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21510 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Versions of the package sinatra from 0.0.0 are vulnerable to Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision via the X-Forwarded-Host (XFH) header. When making a request to a method with redirect applied, it is possible to trigger an Open Redirect Attack by inserting an arbitrary address into this header. If used for caching purposes, such as with servers like Nginx, or as a reverse proxy, without handling the X-Forwarded-Host header, attackers can potentially exploit Cache Poisoning or Routing-based SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24874 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability in CodePeople CP Polls allows Code Injection.This issue affects CP Polls: from n/a through 1.0.71. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37166 | 2026-04-15 | 8.9 High | ||
| ghtml is software that uses tagged templates for template engine functionality. It is possible to introduce user-controlled JavaScript code and trigger a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in some cases. Version 2.0.0 introduces changes to mitigate this issue. Version 2.0.0 contains updated documentation to clarify that while ghtml escapes characters with special meaning in HTML, it does not provide comprehensive protection against all types of XSS attacks in every scenario. This aligns with the approach taken by other template engines. Developers should be cautious and take additional measures to sanitize user input and prevent potential vulnerabilities. Additionally, the backtick character (`) is now also escaped to prevent the creation of strings in most cases where a malicious actor somehow gains the ability to write JavaScript. This does not provide comprehensive protection either. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62796 | 1 Privatebin | 1 Privatebin | 2026-04-15 | 5.8 Medium |
| PrivateBin is an online pastebin where the server has zero knowledge of pasted data. Versions 1.7.7 through 2.0.1 allow persistent HTML injection via the unsanitized attachment filename (attachment_name) when attachments are enabled. An attacker can modify attachment_name before encryption so that, after decryption, arbitrary HTML is inserted unescaped into the page near the file size hint, enabling redirect (e.g., meta refresh) and site defacement and related phishing attacks. Script execution is normally blocked by the recommended Content Security Policy, limiting confidentiality impact. The issue was introduced in 1.7.7 and fixed in 2.0.2. Update to 2.0.2 or later. Workarounds include enforcing the recommended CSP, deploying PrivateBin on a separate domain, or disabling attachments. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51735 | 1 J3ssie | 1 Osmedeus | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Osmedeus is a Workflow Engine for Offensive Security. Cross-site Scripting (XSS) occurs on the Osmedues web server when viewing results from the workflow, allowing commands to be executed on the server. When using a workflow that contains the summary module, it generates reports in HTML and Markdown formats. The default report is based on the `general-template.md` template.The contents of the files are read and used to generate the report. However, the file contents are not properly filtered, leading to XSS. This may lead to commands executed on the host as well. This issue is not yet resolved. Users are advised to add their own filtering or to reach out to the developer to aid in developing a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7048 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with MACsec configuration, a specially crafted packet can cause the MACsec process to terminate unexpectedly. Continuous receipt of these packets with certain MACsec configurations can cause longer term disruption of dataplane traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8386 | 1 Aveva | 1 Application Server | 2026-04-15 | 6.9 Medium |
| The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow an authenticated miscreant (with privilege of "aaConfigTools") to tamper with App Objects' help files and persist a cross-site scripting (XSS) injection that when executed by a victim user, can result in horizontal or vertical escalation of privileges. The vulnerability can only be exploited during config-time operations within the IDE component of Application Server. Run-time components and operations are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0117 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Globalprotect App | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A reliance on untrusted input for a security decision in the GlobalProtect app on Windows devices potentially enables a locally authenticated non-administrative Windows user to escalate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. GlobalProtect App on macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Chrome OS and GlobalProtect UWP App are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8981 | 2 Wordpress, Wpmudev | 2 Wordpress, Broken Link Checker | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| The Broken Link Checker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting due to the use of add_query_arg in /app/admin-notices/features/class-view.php without appropriate escaping on the URL in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59152 | 1 Litestar-org | 1 Litestar | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. In version 2.17.0, rate limits can be completely bypassed by manipulating the X-Forwarded-For header. This renders IP-based rate limiting ineffective against determined attackers. Litestar's RateLimitMiddleware uses `cache_key_from_request()` to generate cache keys for rate limiting. When an X-Forwarded-For header is present, the middleware trusts it unconditionally and uses its value as part of the client identifier. Since clients can set arbitrary X-Forwarded-For values, each different spoofed IP creates a separate rate limit bucket. An attacker can rotate through different header values to avoid hitting any single bucket's limit. This affects any Litestar application using RateLimitMiddleware with default settings, which likely includes most applications that implement rate limiting. Version 2.18.0 contains a patch for the vulnerability. | ||||